Submitted by Linda Barnhart
Cataloging: The Department cataloged 63,534 titles, a whopping 18% increase over the previous year! Of this number, 58,701 titles were copy cataloging (up 20%) and 4,827 were original cataloging (down 1%). (6 titles were done as retrospective conversion.) While the Department did streamline some workflows, much of the increase was due to added positions in the Copy Cataloging and Searching Unit. California State Documents cataloging caught up with the new arrivals. 1,374 CDs from the MP3.com (formerly Vivendi) gift were cataloged, and staff in the Acquisitions Department is preparing the remaining titles for cataloging. Development of a new East Asian Film Collection led to the development of new processes for acquiring and cataloging Asian film/video materials.
Database Maintenance: Database Management sent 57,084 volumes to SRLF. This group also completed merging records for CMRR, SSH Annex, and half of BML for the Master Records for Monographs project. The Pinyin conversion cleanup project was completed, resulting in the correction of over 8,700 bibliographic records, the review of 3,300 series authority records, and the scrutiny of hundreds of pages of printed error reports generated by loading 45,250 converted bib records and 35,580 associated authority records.
Shared Cataloging Program: The SCP record distribution process was transferred successfully to UCSD from CDL, and our sister UC campuses now have access to CDL licensed electronic resources four to six weeks sooner than before. Electronic monographs and how they should be handled by the SCP were hotly debated and resolved system-wide. Working with staff from the BADS Division, SCP catalogers were able to process and distribute 14,393 electronic monographic records (representing six packages) via the SCP. 2,326 electronic journal records, 29 database records, and 1,922 records for California documents were also distributed this fiscal year. Over 33,000 PIDs are being maintained through the Shared Cataloging Program. The SCP Steering Committee was discussed by HOTS and emerged with a new charge and a new name: the SCP Advisory Committee.
Staffing: Compared to last year's major reorganization, this year's staffing was relatively stable, with the biggest changes taking place in the Copy Cataloging and Searching Unit (CCSU). Two new copy catalogers were hired in September. In the winter, two long-time staff members retired, and their successors also took positions in CCSU. We welcomed a new Administrative Assistant into the Department in September. We were able to hire an original cataloger on contract to catalog sound recordings (MP3.com) and books in the humanities, and we were able to re-hire a recalled retiree original cataloger, who concentrated on non-English material. The CJK Unit hired a limited term cataloger to catalog Chinese monographs. The Department reviewed the successes and challenges of last year's reorg through a two-part survey.
Workflow streamlining: The Department continued to move forward in its effort to decentralize the cataloging of electronic resources. Moving image material cataloging was consolidated into one unit (renamed the Music and Media Cataloging Unit) from three. A new technique for the automated searching of materials in the In-Process Collection resulted in more copy cataloging being identified for, and cataloged by, student catalogers.
Division Accomplishments:
Business, Automation, and Database Services (BADS):
Monographs Cataloging Division:
Serials Cataloging and CJK Division:
In support of Strategic Plan Goal 1--Objective 2:
In support of Strategic Plan Goal 1--Objective 4:
In support of Strategic Plan Goal 1--Objective 6; Strategy 2--Objective 6; and Strategy 3--Objective 4:
In support of Strategy 1--Objectives 1 and 2:
In support of Strategy 1--Objective 2:
Morale. Low salaries and budget pressures are having increasingly negative impact on staff morale.
Equity in staff classification levels. We are also finding that, in general, higher levels of skills are required to do our increasingly complex work, with some staff not being appropriately classified.
INNOPAC system performance. The technical mode of our ILS is intensely used, and staff members have changed work schedules to do substantive tasks in off-hours. Catalog Dept. staff are very concerned about the adequacy of our INNOPAC servers, and strongly urge an upgrade.
Cataloging workloads. We are concerned about the ever-increasing growth in electronic resources. Although we have begun to make some inroads, the MP3.com gift, because of its magnitude, remains a concern. The possibility that the 1,800 electronic journals in the China Academic Journals package may need to be cataloged for CDL is also worrisome.
Maintenance workloads. Database maintenance is becoming an increasingly high-level task as we do fewer individual record corrections, with staff instead performing more massive changes to groups of records with sophisticated tools. Our staff has become increasingly creative and adept in techniques for large-scale record manipulation. Along with this increased skill set, however, are rising expectations for changes of extraordinary magnitude, complexity, and speed. In addition, collection development initiatives have greatly affected the Database Management unit; as this workload grows somewhat unpredictably, they are not necessarily staffed to keep pace.
Digital library workloads. When will tasks for the UCSD Digital Library Program impact more than senior department staff? Will there be a need for hands-on assistance with metadata record creation? While there is still clearly a learning curve for all library staff (Catalog Dept. staff included), what practical impacts might be felt here, and when? How will we prioritize?
Shared Cataloging Program and Shared Print Collections. As the cataloging of serial, integrating, and monographic electronic resources becomes increasingly complex, we wonder whether the Shared Cataloging Program as it is currently implemented is a sustainable model. Another facet of the increased complexity is the potential impact of a broadened program of Shared Print collections. What options are possible for the University of California system to improve and sustain collaborative cataloging?
Change management. A variety of anticipated (and unanticipated!) changes will impact staff in unknown ways: the budget situation, changes to campus programs, contract negotiations. In the Catalog Department, we will work on OCLC through the new Connexion client interface, and many catalogers may begin to use the Millennium Cataloging module. These two “system upgrades” could have substantial impact upon how a cataloger does their daily work.